In 2006, Robin Li, the founder of Baidu and the undisputed king of the
Chinese internet search engine who Google failed to dethrone,claimed that the US
giant would be out of China in five years. That dark prediction now looks set to
come true. Sadly, it is not even a zero-sum game: Baidu would benefit from
Google's loss in the short term, but not in the long run. And, with Google
gone, Baidu would feel the effects of a chill wind blowing through the internet
industry, the most dynamic in the Chinese economy, as diversification of opinion
was reduced.
A new hybrid model – featuring more control on one
hand, and gross commercialization on the other – would rise and even expand into
other industries. The image of greater openness and transparency, which
the Chinese government has diligently cultivated, would be damaged. Internet
users would suffer most, of course,especially if access to Google's global
services like gmail were also a victim of the ensuing turmoil. This game will
only create losers – a lot of them.
By saying that its
Chinese-language search engine would no longer adhere to increasingly strict
censorship requirements, Google has changed the rules for multinationals in
China.For the first time in living memory, a multinational giant has openly
defied and challenged Chinese authority.
Google has decided not to
follow the same old path trodden by almost every other multinational: carving
out a pragmatic business strategy in the grey area between local rules and those
of the global village.“When in Rome,do as the Romans do” used to be a convenient
excuse for multinationals operating on the mainland and a way to protect
them. Google has torn up that book. Every CEO doing business on the
mainland now has to ask himself: how different is my company's situation from
that of Google, and what do I choose to do? If he does not ask himself that
question,someone else will, and it will not be pleasant.
Google
cannot be ignored. To do so would be like a New Yorker ignoring King Kong on the
Empire State Building.But, like the huge ape, Google is a sensible giant. It
represents a good thing: brilliant innovation turned into unimaginable
wealth through an honest business model. A start-up founded by two Stanford PhDs
10 years ago, it is today valued at US$186 billion. Most inspiring, Google
has done less evil than any of the other big companies arriving today's status.
The Chinese internet industry presents a great opportunity,as can be seen
from the success of local internet companies like Baidu, Tencent and Alibaba,
which have expanded into industry leaders, enjoying astronomic market value.
Many observers believe that the business opportunities are just too lucrative
for Google to walk away. They tend to see Google's decision as being
calculating, rather than based on principal. With Google briefing
the US government on the situation, some analysts believe Google is engaging in
an audacious and brilliant offensive: by politicising and then seeking
leverage,the company is aiming to secure a better business environment for
itself on the mainland, they claim. According to these observers, Google may win
this fight while its back is against the wall.
The chances are
slim, however. Even if Google is as wise as David and as strong as Goliath, it
is still battling the Leviathan. Since last summer, a determined, systematic,
and co-ordinated operation has targeted the heights of the Chinese internet
industry. It may not be aimed at one specific company, but decision makers are
fully prepared to crush any resistance. Even if it has to pull back – as was the
case with its Green Dam filtering software, which Beijing originally said would
have to be installed on all computers sold in the country by both domestic and
foreign manufacturers – it will advance on other front.The US government won't
be of much help anyway. The best scenario I can imagine for Google is to win
some breathing space, again similar to the Green Dam project, which has been
postponed, not canceled. Would Google accept a probation period?