The Emerging Headache of QE3
![]() |
The Fed has promised to purchase US$ 40 billion worth of mortgage-backed
securities (MBS) per month until it is satisfied with the economy. By all
accounts an unemployment rate above 7 percent is not satisfactory to the Fed.
Its own analysis doesn't expect the unemployment rate to fall below 7 percent in
two years. That suggests that QE3 will last for over two years, and the total
amount of MBS purchases will exceed $1 trillion, more than QE1's US$ 1
trillion.
Through its purchases of MBS, the Fed provides direct
support to the housing market and banks. The housing market is still wobbly. No
economic recovery can be strong without a strong housing market. The Fed's
purchases will narrow the spread between the treasury yield and housing
financing cost. The 10-year treasury yield is 1.8 percent. If the mortgage
interest rate is decreased to such a level, it provides ample refinancing
opportunity, which alleviates the debt burden for the heavily indebted household
sector.
The United States' household sector is US$ 12.9 trillion
in debt, down nearly US$ 1 trillion from the peak, partly through bankruptcies.
The pressure for reducing the debt is considerable. It is a major factor in
keeping the economy weak. Through decreasing the interest burden, QE3 is likely
to lessen the deleveraging pressure.
The United States' household
real estate value has declined by 30 percent from the peak in 2006. The current
aggregate value of US$ 16 trillion is slightly above 100 percent of GDP and
still high by historical standards. If the market adjusts naturally, it may well
fall another 30 percent. The Fed's actions so far have decreased its decline.
QE3 is likely to continue this support. However, the artificial support can't
reverse the trend. It merely allows the nominal GDP to grow while keeping
housing value stable. It cushions the downturn, but also saps the recovery
strength.
The Fed is unhappy with the strength of the economic
recovery. It has itself to blame. The monetary and fiscal stimulus prevented a
thorough cleansing of the inefficient economic activities that built up during
the bubble economy. The economy didn't reach its natural bottom in the downturn.
Therefore, the upturn is weak too. Many unproductive economic activities still
take up a significant chunk of resources. Finance and health care, in
particular, are still highly inefficient and take up nearly one-fourth of the
economy. The Fed's monetary policy cannot substitute for structural reforms. QE3
will not create a strong economy.
Stagflation in Emerging
Economies
- Marriage, Sex and Character
- China Railway Corp. to Issue Bonds
- Passage to History
- Don't Expect Praises
- Investment in Agriculture Climbs
- Final Fantasy
- A Foul Find
- In Friday's Papers: Cabinet to Reduce Red Tape, Nationwide Inspection on Health Food
- Healthcare Needs Fundamental Reforms, Experts Say
- Healthcare and One-Child Policy: China's Ticking Bomb
- Sign up to receive our free daily newsletter
- Why Foxconn's Switch to Robots Hasn't Been Automatic
- Too Big To Fail Is Bigger than Ever
- Graphics:Gold Consumption Jumps to Record High in Q1
- Marriage, Sex and Character
- Delicacies of the Chinese Dream
- Deputy Shanghai Mayor 'to Take over at CIC'
- Investment Company Asks: Can We Legally Short Sell?
- Playing the Long Game
- The Real Reason the Stock Market Is Slumping
- Is China Welcome in the Arctic?



































